However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, while operating the business place with the trade name “C” in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Btel 504, advertised the above business place on the Internet “D” website, etc. and employed E, etc. as female employees.

From May 29, 2014 to June 2, 2014, the Defendant engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. for business purposes by allowing female employees E, etc. to engage in similar intercourse by receiving the price of sexual traffic equivalent to 80,000 won from male customers in the name of the above officetel who found the above officetel from his/her male customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation], brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic crimes subject to the age of 19 years or older, and that there is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months), the basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months), [the decision of sentence] [the decision of sentence] that the defendant is punished by a fine for the same crime, the fact that the defendant again commits the crime of this case is disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant is against the defendant, the business period of this case is not long, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime are considered as a whole, shall be determined as the same as the order.