However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 21, 2014, the Defendant recommended the victim E, who was introduced through D, to make an investment of 1,650 square meters of G complex sites 72,638 square meters in G-si F in Gwangju-si, which were located in G-si, as a parking lot, and to receive investment funds from the victim E.

On the 24th day of the same month, the Defendant, at the parking lot site located in F in Gwangju-si, and even if the acquisition price for the facility to be paid to H was KRW 40 million, the Defendant may commence construction works to waive this right to the victim’s “A person who has already installed the facility on the parking lot site and has the right to install the facility on the parking lot.”

H may receive a written waiver of the right to grant KRW 60 million as the purchase price for the facility.

Even though the actual parking lot site was reduced, the acquisition price of the facility can not be reduced.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred the sum of KRW 40 million on the 26th day of the same month and KRW 60 million on the 27th day of the same month to the new bank account (I) in the name of the defendant under the name of the victim as the price for taking over the facilities from the victim.

On the 29th day of the same month, although the Defendant did not think that it will be used as an employee contact with LH Corporation and viewing, the Defendant continued to request the victim to take a phone to provide personnel service to the person who assisted the parking lot business, such as LH Corporation and viewing, and to provide personnel service, and to provide 10 million won. In the event of personnel service, it would be very difficult to conduct the business in the future.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was transferred to the above new bank account from the victim under the pretext of contact with public officials, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant was given a total of KRW 30 million by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and D;

1. Entry of the statement protocol made by the prosecution against E;

1. J.