However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 04:37 on April 29, 2019, while getting on and moving a taxi, the Defendant took a bath on the street near the station located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and when the Defendant, who was unaware of the location of the Suwon-gu D Elementary School, a destination, requested the police officer of the Suwon Police Station E zone where he was working as a central station at the destination, the Defendant took a bath on the ground that he did not know of the destination to the taxi article, and took a bath on the ground that he did not know of the destination, the Defendant took a bath, and she took a bath, and f took a bath, and f took the f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s bat, and f’s f’s f’s f’s bat and f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s bat.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties on the prevention and restraint of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Each statement of H and I;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] The act of obstructing the police officer's performance of his duties by taking a bath and assault against the police officer dispatched after receiving a report from the defendant, the basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties [Type 1], the imprisonment of six months to one year and six months [Pronouncement 1], and the act of obstructing the police officer's performance of duties by taking a bath and assault against the police officer dispatched after receiving a report.

In order to establish the law and order of the state and eradicate the light of public authority, it is necessary to strictly punish crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties.

In addition, the defendant committed the crime of this case without prejudice even though he was subject to a suspended sentence of imprisonment in 2015 for the same crime.

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, and the age of the defendant.