If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

On May 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 23:20 around Kimpo-si B, operated by the victim C in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and (b) seeed the horses from the victim, which would be able to make a congested; (c) lying the horses into the table, lying the horses into the table, putting the foods on the table, putting the foods on a large scale, taking a bath with a large sound; and (d) 1:40 minutes per hour and 40 minutes per noise.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on photographic data;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not require strict punishment in light of the fact that the defendant committed a crime related to violence several times, and the crime of this case during the same kind of repeated crime. However, there is no need to punish the defendant. However, the defendant reflects his mistake, the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent with the victim, and the degree of damage to the victim is relatively minor, etc. shall be determined by taking into account the following factors: (a) the defendant's negligence is against himself/herself; (b) the