For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged in this case on the ground that there was no proof of the crime.

Examining the record, the above determination by the court below is justifiable.

There is no error of exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or of misunderstanding the legal principles on the criminal intent or criminal relation of fraud.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.