However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 16, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 18:30, at the “C Burial” located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the display stand; (b) at around 18:0, one roller width equivalent to the total market price of KRW 2,000, and one roller width equivalent to the total market price of KRW 2,000, the market price of KRW 2,000, and four (4) the difference of the market price of KRW 1,000, three (1,000, three (3) the number of sunlights equivalent to the market price of KRW 1,500, and four (5,00,000, the market price of KRW 5,000, and four (4) the total market price of KRW 30,00,00.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal investigation reports, records of seizure and list of seizure, and investigation reports;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 329 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, following the suspended sentence, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of the instant case, shall be determined as the same as the order.

An unfavorable normal situation: The degree of damage is minor and partial damage has been returned, the previous power has been punished by a fine, and the external power has been very old, and it is against the fact that the other force has been very long.