In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

Co-defendant C, and D, around November 18, 2014, 23:40, were fluencing in the FKapet in D and smoking tobacco in a conversation.

At that time, Defendant A, who had been in another seat, tried to pay attention to the smoking of tobacco to the above C and D, but the above C and D did not so.

Accordingly, Defendant A called “Woo without wrapping Ba” to Defendant C, D, etc., and C, D, et al. called “C and D” with each other, and assaulted Defendant A and B jointly with Defendant A and B, by putting them out of the Kaf, and sphering them out of the Kaf, and sphering them out of the Kaf, and assaulting Defendant A and B.

As such, Defendant A and B committed assault against the above assault, and C and D jointly shared, such as fasting, cutting down, tightly cutting down, cutting down on the floor of the c and D, drinking and sprinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant A and B;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against Co-defendant C and D;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of the victims of their standing photographs (C and D);

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, each of the choice of punishment, and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;