게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of each of the above penalties for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B On October 1, 2013, the Seoul Northern District Court sentenced two years of suspension of execution to a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry in August 1, 2013, which became final and conclusive on October 9, 2013.
1. Defendants B and B of the joint criminal conduct by the Defendants, and Defendant B, around February 2013, set up a screen game machine that was not classified, and operated the game room by Defendant A, and Defendant A, by setting up rent for the game room and installation cost of the game machine, agreed that Defendant B will pay approximately three million won per month to Defendant B according to the profits of the game room.
Accordingly, around April 11, 2013, Defendant A leased the rental deposit of approximately KRW 5 million and KRW 112.7 square meters in the space of approximately 5 million in the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 502 and 505 square meters in total from around April 11, 201, and Defendant B from around April 22, 2013. The same year is applicable to Defendant B.
5. Until January 1, 200, without being classified into “D” in the same place, a set of 25 Esnet Es Scoke screen and 3 consular machines were installed, and a set of 1,000 won per cash to many unspecified customers who found there was a set of 50,000 won in cash in the game machine, and an exchange was made after converting 2,000 won per cash acquired by the customer as a result of the game to 10,000 won per cash acquired by the customer.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to use the unclassified game products and carried out a business exchange of tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of the game products.
2. On May 1, 2013, Defendant A, who controlled the operation of a game room from the Seoul Regional Police Agency’s living order and a metropolitan control investigation team, was seized, and the screen games were seized. Defendant A had a new game machine purchased and installed to operate the game room.
The defendant from May 24, 2013 to the same year.
6. Until January 6, 200, the instant net Scot was not classified in the trade name “D” at the same place.