beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.09.08 2017고정212

식품위생법위반

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a restaurant in the name of “D” in the net city C.

On October 14, 2016, at around 20:50, the Defendant provided three customers in the above resting restaurant “No. 1-2” with three alcohol alcohol, and provided 14 customers in the “no. 4-7” with three alcohol alcohol, so the Defendant provided 14 customers in “no. 4-7” with three alcohol alcohol.

As a result, the defendant, as a resting restaurant business operator, violated the code of practice of food service providers by allowing customers to drink.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the results of business trips;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Article 97 of the relevant Act on criminal facts, subparagraph 6 of Article 97 of the Food Sanitation Act and Article 44 (1) of the same Act concerning selective punishment, and selection of fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59 (1) of the Suspension of Sentence)