2. Although there are favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects against his will, the crime of this case is deemed to be unfair because the defendant committed the crime of this case, which is a fundamental duty of the people, is deprived of military duty and requires strict punishment, and the defendant has been subject to criminal punishment several times due to the violation of the Military Service Act. In addition, the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the period of repeated crime due to larceny, etc., and all of the sentencing factors indicated in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character, character, environment, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime, etc., are deemed to be too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.