When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 9, 2020, at around 13:11, the Defendant reported 112 that “A” restaurant located in Thai-gun B, Thai-gun (“C”) and told the Defendant, who was sent to the Thai-gun, to stop the Defendant, who was in the influence of alcohol, and recommended him to stop the Defendant, who was in the police box of the Thai-gun Police Station, and to stop the her home.” On June 9, 2020, the Defendant saw the Defendant to her to her, and she her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her part

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police officer's written statement to E and F, evidentiary materials and statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Consideration of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the circumstances and contents of the crime, character and conduct of the defendant and the fact that there is no record of the same kind of power