In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Defendant

A and C are married couple, and the defendant B is the assistancecar of the defendant A.

Defendant

A has long long been living in the village near the Gangwon Yangyang-gun D, the Defendants tried to prevent part of the access road on the ground that part of the roads entering the village to C and the above village are the ground of the house site.

According to the above public offering, around 06:00 on July 21, 2018, the Defendants provided water to the Defendants for work, and C provided water to the Defendants, and the Defendants violated the middle part of the access road to the yellow malk, and set up onto the inside the inside of the road with soil attached up within the limit of 159cm, thereby making it impossible for the vehicles to pass through the access road.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with C to obstruct the traffic on land.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of the F, E, and G;

1. Application of a certified copy of cadastral map and each photograph;

1. Defendants: Articles 185 and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act recognize their mistakes, the Defendants have no criminal records exceeding the same criminal records or fines, and the closure of the Defendants’ installed may be removed from the place where it is difficult, and the result of traffic obstruction actually occurred due to the instant crime is not serious. The punishment as set forth in the order shall be determined by taking into account all the circumstances of sentencing, including the following: