except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 11, 2016, the Defendant purchased the excavated machine at the Suwon Line B building and D office located in Suwon Line B, Inc., Ltd., the Defendant borrowed KRW 30,188,810 per month from the victim to pay the principal and interest in installments for 60 months. On the same day, the Defendant established the right to collateral security of KRW 12,90,000,000 as the victim of the right to collateral security during the excavation period.

On August 23, 2016, the Defendant: (a) transferred the so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called “victims” to the so-called so-called the “victims” in front of the Dong Office of the Dong Office of the Dong Office of the Dong Office of the Dong Office of the Dong Office of the Dong,

Summary of Evidence

1. In full view of the facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court of this case, i.e., the Defendant’s transfer of the extraction machine by taking over approximately KRW 35 million from F around August 23, 2016; ② the Defendant did not notify the victim of the transfer of the extraction machine or the place of custody; ③ the Defendant did not receive the extraction machine by failing to repay the loan to F; ③ the Defendant was unable to receive the extraction machine by failing to pay the loan to F; and until now, the Defendant was unaware of the location of the extraction machine, etc., it is reasonable to view that the Defendant concealed the extraction machine as collateral and interfered with the victim’s exercise of rights. Accordingly, the Defendant’s above assertion is not acceptable)

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of credit transaction agreement, loan product description, construction machinery register, and matters to be registered under statutes;

1. Relevant Article 323 of the Criminal Act and Article 323 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is the suspended sentence.