2. In light of the fact that the amount of deceitation of this case is not so big that the victim did not reach an agreement or did not recover damage, the defendant appears not to seriously reflect the crime in light of the fact that the defendant was sentenced to a fine once as well as a suspended sentence once as a single crime of the same kind, and the defendant's overall sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.