However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 10:10 on July 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received a notice of notification from the Jeju East Police Station C District D, and slope E as an act of disturbance of drinking from the Jeju East Police Station C District; (b) stated, “I am the same son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son, I son son son son son son son son, I son son son son son son son, I son son son son son son son son son, I son son son son son son son son son son, I son son son son son son son son, I son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son, and thereby, interfere with his legitimate execution of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D and E;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Commercial concurrence and choice of punishment: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following factors shall be taken into account the conditions of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act);

1. Social service order: The sentencing guidelines for the sentencing of Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. include the scope of the recommended sentence [the scope of the sentence of punishment of obstruction of the performance of official duties, obstruction of the performance of official duties, obstruction of the performance of official duties, Type 1 (Obstruction of the Performance of Official Duties), basic area: Imprisonment with prison labor in six months] and the following circumstances; considering the favorable circumstances: The favorable circumstances: (a) recognized a crime; (b) recognized a crime; (c) was against the police officer; and (d) was not much significant to the police officer; (d) was sentenced to a suspended sentence for six months as a crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties in 207; and (e) was sentenced to a fine of ten times for a crime of violence, etc. by 2014; and (e) the Defendant