Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

The Defendant owned the land of Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, the Defendant owned the land of Kimcheon-si, D, and E, and had been naturally formed from the previous to the drainage route, and was adjacent to the G land of Kimcheon-si.

On November 2013, the Defendant arbitrarily changed the drainage route, which was in line with G land in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, Kim Jong-si, and Kim Jong-si, the lower part of the land of the victim, and moved the drainage channel in the straight line shape, by putting about the degree of 1.5 meters on the lower part of the land of the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant moved to the drainage, which is the boundary mark, and made it impossible to recognize the boundary of the land.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. F statement made to the defendant in the police interrogation protocol;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (in cases of attaching photographs, such as a certified copy of the register, a family relation certificate submitted by the complainant, attaching a field photograph, and attaching a site

1. Article 370 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;