However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. 2018. 7. 28. 00:10 경 범행 피고인은 2018. 7. 28. 00:10 경 고양 시 일산 동구 B 빌딩 1 층 주차장에서, 술에 취하여 쓰러진 사람이 있다는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 경기 일산 동부 경찰서 C 지구대 소속 경장 D이 귀가할 것을 권유하며 인적 사항을 물어보자 화가 나, “ 씨 발, 내가 뭘 잘못했는데, 야 이 씨 발 새끼야, 니가 뭔 데, 건들지 마! ”라고 소리치며 손으로 위 D의 멱살을 잡고 밀치는 등 폭행하였다.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and criminal investigations by police officers.

2. 2018. 7. 28. 00:40 경 범행 피고인은 같은 날 00:40 경 같은 구 E에 있는 경기 일산 동부 경찰서 C 지구대에서, 위와 같은 행위로 공무집행 방해죄 등으로 현행범 체포를 당하여 인치되자 화가 나, “야 이 씨 발 새끼들 아, 내가 뭘 그렇게 잘못했는데, 야, 너네

Marin, 198, the son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s, the son’s son’s son’s, the son’s son’s son’s son’s.

They have committed violence, such as spitation, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife and die in the match, and spite on the head of the above D, which prepared the document.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and criminal investigations by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. On-site photographs, motion pictures, photographs, and motion pictures taken on the part of damage;

1. Application of the DVD Acts and subordinate statutes to records of video records;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment (elective of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Crimes No. 1 and No. 2 applicable to the sentencing guidelines for the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act in the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] are the basic area (from June to January, 1) (no person in special sentencing).