beta
(영문) 창원지방법원통영지원 2016.02.04 2015가합102

임금

Text

1. On July 1, 2014, the Defendant stated each of the corresponding amounts and each of the above amounts to the Plaintiffs in the attached Form 2 cited amount.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs are employed as public workers from the Defendant (the name was changed from a indefinite contract to a public service position pursuant to a collective agreement concluded on October 23, 2013), and work as the Defendant’s Road Repair Board, Agricultural Machinery Repair Board, and street cleaners.

B. The Defendant concluded each collective agreement and wage agreement with the B trade union to which the Plaintiffs belong (hereinafter “instant trade union”), from 2011 to 2014, and the part relating to the instant case in the said collective agreement and wage agreement is as shown in attached Form 3.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant wage payment criteria”) in total.

In accordance with the wage standard of this case, the defendant paid the plaintiffs' basic salary, continuous service additional charges (on the basis of the wage agreement in 2012, before the transition to the salary system), bonuses (end-end allowances), welfare expenses (age subsidy, transportation subsidy, holiday leave expenses, risk allowances, children school allowances, family allowances), and other allowances (Bans' allowances, work encouragement allowances), etc. to the workers of the street cleaners. The defendant paid basic salary, bonus (end-day allowances, regular work allowances, physical training allowances, work encouragement allowances), welfare expenses (regular meal expenses, household meal expenses, transportation subsidy, scarbing leave expenses), and other allowances (child school allowance) to the workers of the street cleaners.

On the other hand, as set forth in the wage payment standard of this case, the defendant calculated only ordinary wages, such as basic pay, special duty allowance, work encouragement allowance, fixed meal allowance, transportation subsidy, risk allowance, etc. according to the plaintiffs' occupational categories, and based on this, the defendant paid overtime work allowance, night work allowance, holiday work allowance, and annual paid leave allowance to the plaintiffs.

E. On July 18, 2014, the Plaintiffs calculated the Defendant’s holiday allowance, weather allowance, good attendance allowance, physical training allowance, etc. by including the Defendant in the ordinary wages.