When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On December 24, 2013, at around 08:15, the Defendant, in the C market located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on December 24, 2013, and as a matter of view in front of the store run by the victim D, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by speaking to the victim as “Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is you would drink, that Is that Is that Is that you would drink, that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is you would drink, that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is you would s

2. On January 7, 2014, at the same place on the same day and around 04:53, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by saying, “The victim is a person of China year, year-end, year-end, year-end, year-end, year-end, opening, e.g., e., e., g., day-to-day.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, F, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to recording notes;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.