However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 2, 201, at around 13:00, the Defendant discovered the victim H located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, that he was seated by C in the above C et al., and proposed the Defendant, D, E, and F to theft the wall while he was seated by C et al., while he was sittinged in the above C et al., within the I party room operated by C et al.

C, D, E, and F did not look at the victim's attitude, and reported the network, and the defendant took out 600,000 won in cash, which was the victim's possession in the Kabtere.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property together with C, D, E, and F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of F, C, or E;

1. Application of the police statement law to H

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more;