However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 26, 2014, the Defendant discovered a number plate of G Obaba, where the victim F (ma, 42 years old) was stolen in the street near “E” located in Ulsan-dong-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S. (E).

The Defendant, as seen above, embezzled the number plates, without stating necessary procedures, such as returning them to the victim.

2. At around 18:30 on September 27, 2014, the Defendant illegally used air defense, the Defendant: (a) attached G Austria’s number plate, which was acquired as referred to in the above paragraph 129, at the underground parking lot located in the Nam-gu Nandong Home Center located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-ro 129, 25, to the Defendant’s ownership; (b) thereby, the Defendant used the number plate, which is an air defense, for the purpose of exercising the right. (c) From the date and time of the foregoing “paragraph 2” to October 31, 2014, the Defendant exercised the air defense that was illegally used by the Defendant by operating the off-to-land number plate, which is the air-to-land, within Ulsan-gu, U.S., in order to exercise the right.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records, internal investigation reports, respective photographs, certificates of disuse of a two-wheeled motor vehicle, and stolen and stolen vehicle tax data;

1. Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 238 (2) and Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising illegal-use air defense), Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act, which applies to criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is contrary to the reasoning of the suspended sentence, age, and without any criminal records, and the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the background of the instant case, character and conduct, and environment, shall be determined by comprehensively taking account of the following factors.