2. In light of the judgment, the Defendant committed the instant crime even seven times or more, even though the Defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime, and the instant crime was committed by the Defendant, and even though the Defendant could sufficiently be resolved in dialogue with the victim, the Defendant’s act was committed by taking the breath of the victim’s breath and wearing the breath in six times, and the nature of the relevant crime is not good. Nevertheless, considering various circumstances, such as the motive for the instant crime alleged by the Defendant, the Defendant already was punished by a fine more than the fine of the summary order (500,000 won) originally notified to the Defendant, and there is no change in the special circumstances or circumstances that may be considered in the new sentencing after the sentence of the judgment below, the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.