2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) the Defendant did not have the record of being punished for the same crime; (c) the extent of deception was weak; (d) the Defendant did not recover most of the damages other than those paid to some of the interests; (b) there was no special circumstance or circumstance that may be newly considered in sentencing after the pronouncement of the lower judgment; and (c) the Defendant’s character and conduct, environment, relationship with the victim; (d) motive, means, and consequence of the instant crime; and (e) other circumstances that form the condition of sentencing as indicated in the argument and the record, including the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court against the Defendant is deemed reasonable

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.