beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.23 2016고단1882

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 1, 2, and 5 shall be confiscated.

10,000 won from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Majority Relations] On November 7, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Daegu District Court on the part of November 7, 2014, and completed the execution of the said punishment on February 27, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant treated the Meart cacule (copon; hereinafter “copon”), fluor, fluor, and scopon method, as follows, by the following methods:

A. On March 28, 2016, the Defendant was parked on a road on which it is impossible to find out whether it is located in the Daegu Suwon-gu.

C Handphones non-phones (one minute) received from C in the car of C were put into a single-use injection machine and administered in water in a way of injection.

B. On March 29, 2016, at around 02:10 on March 29, 2016, the Defendant filed a lawsuit in a manner of keeping in the Defendant’s bank 54 mpics, fluor 54 mpics, and 54 mpics, each of which was melting the water in a single-use injection machine at the front of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.

2. On March 28, 2016, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim E to get on a business taxi operated by the victim E and go to the Seoul Station; (b) requested the Yongsan-gu and Seocho-gu not to get off the taxi even after having arrived at the Seoul Station, and did not pay the taxi expenses; and (c) on March 29, 2016, the police officers called up upon receiving the victim’s 112 report from the victim at around 23:40 on March 28, 2016, caused the victim to interfere with the victim’s taxi operation by force for about 40 minutes by forcing the victim to get on a passenger without complying with the request.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Protocols of seizure and list of seizure (lists of evidence Nos. 10, 21);

1. Each statement on narcotics (the net 20,23,37);

1. A report on investigation (calculated additional charges);