If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On May 2, 2017, the Defendant driven a CKan-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-k

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the police officer's arrest report, report on the situation of the driver who is placed in driving, report on the investigation (report on the situation of the driver who is placed in driving),

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In view of the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides support for the children suffering from dementia and that it is difficult to maintain their living conditions, driving of re-driving is not likely to cause a crime, even though he had the record of having been sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million in 2005, a fine of KRW 5 million in 2015 due to driving of alcohol, and even if he had the record of having been sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million in 2015, it cannot be deemed that the amount of fine prescribed in the summary order is excessive in consideration of the nature of the crime, the alcohol concentration in blood, and the equity in punishment with other persons who have committed the same kind of crime.

Therefore, the punishment is determined as ordered.