However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 6, 2015, at around 03:30, the Defendant: (a) intruded the victim D's house located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, with a vehicle parked in front of that house in front of that house in front of that house, and he stored it in the front of the wall, and laid off 40,000 alinium cans ( approximately 50 km) out of the wall, the market price of which is the victim's ownership, and stored in the front of the wall, and then cut off the Defendant's shoulder.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

2. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the decision on the suspended sentence) for the general property - Types 4 (Special Larceny) [Special Convict] for the Larceny [Special Convict] - In a case where a person intrudes into a place other than the indoor residential space of a living-type crime in the mitigated element of punishment [the decision on the recommended area] [the scope of the recommendation area] - the special mitigation area / [the special mitigation area] - the special mitigation area / the special mitigation area / the special mitigation area / [the general mitigation area] - there is no serious reflect criminal punishment [the suspended sentence] - there is no positive criminal punishment power for the main reasons for the suspended sentence - there is no positive criminal punishment power for the general participation : A positive reflect [the decision on the suspended sentence] : The defendant acknowledges and reflects all mistakes; the victim's damage amount is insignificant and the victim expressed his/her intention not to punish the defendant; the victim's family is supported by a family member; the order of suspended sentence is ordered.