소유권이전등기
1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim that changed in exchange at the trial are dismissed.
2. The total cost of the lawsuit.
1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases, and thus, this case is quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
The two pages of the judgment of the first instance court shall be changed to "each person has the obligation to cancel the registration of ownership transfer" in the nine pages of the judgment of the first instance court.
Two pages 16-18 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be changed as follows:
(2) In light of the respective statements in Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 6, each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 3, and each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 3 and witness C and witness D of the court of first instance cannot be trusted as they are. The remaining evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize the title trust of the real estate of this case. Since there are no other evidence, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit
2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just and there is no justifiable ground for the conjunctive claim that changed on an exchange at the trial. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal and the above conjunctive claim are dismissed.