However, the execution of imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 20, 2016, around 20:25, the Defendant, at the entrance entrance event site of D 4 story located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, stolen the victim’s possession price, which is equivalent to KRW 790,000, cart, which was displayed to be sold by other victims E, by placing the victim’s market price at KRW 790,00,000.

2. On November 20, 2016, from around 20:21 to 21:29 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft with the victim F, a person in charge of other security management, who was the victim F, by neglecting surveillance over the surrounding area on the D 4th floor in the preceding paragraph; (b) the Defendant committed a theft with the Defendant, by putting the goods equivalent to the total market value of KRW 95,160,000, such as 1 strings, red strings, 1 strings, 1 strings, and 1 strings, 1 strings, and 1 strings, and without calculating the amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Entry of the police statement protocol regarding E;

1. Statement;

1. Investigation report (probed statement, etc.), list of damaged articles, and photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning video images of CCTV data;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense. Article 329 (Selection of Punishment of Imprisonment)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that there is no criminal history exceeding half of the defendant and the fine, and taking into account the return of

1. Protective observation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;