손해배상(자)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following modifications or additions. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
The attached damages calculation table of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be replaced by the attached damages calculation table of the judgment of the court of first instance.
At the bottom of the fourth judgment of the first instance, the following contents shall be added to the bottom of the second instance:
“The Plaintiff asserts that 45% permanent disability of 45% applying occupational coefficient 5 to Mabro diveropic damage ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate No. 1-2-3-4 of the instant accident. As the Plaintiff’s ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate No. e.g., pressure ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate eb., e., e., e., e., 13,20, 24, 25, and 28 of the instant accident. According to the Plaintiff’s statements on the premise that the Plaintiff was privately requested from the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff was unable to obtain a fixed ebratary ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate e.