However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 27, 2016, on the ground that the drinking value is too high in front of the convenience store C located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant investigated the circumstances by the police officer E of the police station D police box called the above drinking house to the 112 report of the drinking house operator while investigating the situation by the police officer E of the police station D police box called the above drinking house on July 27, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties related to the handling of 112 reported case by police officers.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of a copy of work log, or a copy of a public official certificate;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do134, Jan. 1, 201>

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;