국가유공자요건비해당결정취소
The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.
1. Basic facts and the background of the instant disposition;
A. On March 20, 1989, the Plaintiff entered the Army, and was discharged from military service on May 23, 1991.
B. While the Plaintiff was given a leave of leave during military service and the Plaintiff entered in the written complaint as a result of the occurrence of liverness during a regular leave of absence, the Plaintiff stated the five pages of the evidence No. 8-1, which is the medical record at the time of the Plaintiff’s occurrence, as the announcement of the comparison of the unification discussion between South and North Korea, stating that “The statement about the remarks of the anti-state from the Sam village during the period of
On November 15, 1989, which had been living at home, the Plaintiff suffered a stimulative disease (liver) from the Plaintiff around 2:00 new walls.
C. On June 28, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the Defendant on the ground that the Plaintiff asserted that “a person of distinguished service to the State (hereinafter “instant application of distinguished service”) occurred due to insufficient measures concerning continuous overwork, stress, and symptoms in the military.”
On October 7, 2014, based on the result of the deliberation of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement as follows, the Defendant issued a notice of determination on whether a person who rendered distinguished services to the State or a person eligible for veteran's compensation is ineligible (hereinafter "instant disposition").
In light of the fact that two external wounds are not verified during military service, that objective proof data received physical excessive or stress is not confirmed, that king's medical advisory opinion about liver quality does not meet the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran's compensation [based on recognition], the fact that there is no dispute, Gap, 6, 7, 10, 11, 11, 1 and 4, each statement (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. The plaintiff's assertion was entered into a physical or mental health state, and there was no particular disease before entering the military. Among the plaintiff's family members, there was no person who received treatment or administered the same disease as the plaintiff.
The plaintiff has been in charge of more business than other sick professionals until the latest time.