In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

Defendant

A is an employee of the D Pharmacy in Busan, and Defendant B is a pharmacist of the said D Pharmacy and the name of the founder of the said D Pharmacy.

1. Notwithstanding that Defendant A is not a pharmacy founder or a pharmacist, around June 15, 2013, around 07:15, Defendant A sold the drugs to customers at the above D Pharmacy, and received KRW 3,000, 200, 3,000.

2. Defendant A, an employee of Defendant B, committed an act of violation as above with respect to the Defendant’s duties at the date, time, and place in the above paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Certificate of pharmacy establishment, and pharmacist’s license; and

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning documentary evidence pictures and documentary evidence pictures;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Articles 93(1)7 and 44(1) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act; the choice of a fine and fine

B. Defendant B: Articles 97, 93(1)7, and 44(1) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act; selection of fines

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;