A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 1, 2018, at the E cafeteria located in Sejong City around 01:0, the Defendant 2: (a) while drinking alcoholic beverages together with the mar-type A, frighting together with the mar-type A; (b) Defendant B, a police officer affiliated with a police box of the Sejong Police Station, dispatched upon receipt of the 112 report, sent the Defendant and A out of the above mar; (c) sent the Defendant and A to go back to the above mar; (d) brought them out of the above mar; (d) brought them out of the mar, brought them out of the mar; and (e) brought them out of the mar-type mar; and (e) brought them out of the mar-type mar; and (e) brought them out of the mar-type mar-type mar.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on the 112 reported case, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim G about two weeks of alcohol and tension.

2. Defendant A: (a) at the above date, at the above time and place, Defendant B, a birthee, was asked to a slope H (43 Dop), a police officer affiliated with the above police box; (b) she took a bath to the above H; and (c) her hand took a h’s left arms.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers regarding the handling of the 112 reported case, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted on the victim H about two weeks of medical treatment and injury on the left-hand hand knife and tension.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to G, H and I;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of photographs and investigative reporting Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of harm)

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants’ choice of punishment: Imprisonment with prison labor

1. The defendants under suspended execution: The following circumstances and the defendants' age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. are recorded and the arguments of this case are made on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act.