2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is a plastic house (the form of a plastic house; hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) of 82.5 square meters on the ground of the pipe structure on the ground of Pakistan at the time of Pakistan.

B. On May 4, 2012, the Defendant issued a corrective order that the instant building should be restored to its original state on the ground that it was illegally constructed in violation of Article 20 of the Building Act. On June 5, 2012, the Plaintiff issued a corrective order on the ground that the instant building was constructed in violation of Article 14 of the Building Act. However, on July 11, 2012, the Defendant issued a corrective order on the ground that the instant building was constructed in violation of the provision of Article 14 of the Building Act. However, on the ground that the Plaintiff’s failure to comply with such order, the Defendant filed an administrative appeal with the Gyeonggi-do Administrative Appeals Commission. The Defendant issued a corrective order on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Article 20 of the Building Act, and the Plaintiff did not file a corrective order on the ground that the Plaintiff violated the provision of Article 14 of the Building Act, and thus, issued a corrective order on the ground that the instant building was not subject to the corrective order on the ground that the Plaintiff violated the provision of Article 20 of the Building Act.