When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 13:40 on the road in front of the Papju City, the victim C (the 57-year old) was set up a dry field adjacent to the road as an openter so that large-scale vehicles can pass through. However, without the consent of the Defendant, the Defendant used the above open space, thereby bombing the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. C’s statement of statement (the defendant was in a dispute with the victim only and did not have assaulted while she was in a dub, but the criminal law refers to the exercise of force against a person’s body, and the act of breathing a dub shall also be included in the concept of the above “Assault,” and thus, the defendant’s assertion shall not be accepted).

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.