beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.12.04 2014나10548

명의신탁해지를원인으로한소유권이전등기

Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff is a clan with a unique meaning that consists of descendants of Q and R, Q and R, who are 20 years old and older than 11 years old and older than 11 years old and older than 11 years old and older, as a joint line.

The plaintiff asserted in the preparatory brief dated March 18, 2014 that "a clan consisting of descendants of 11 years old D" was changed to D on the date of pleading on September 30, 2014. However, the plaintiff asserted that the preparatory brief dated October 23, 2014 was 20 years old Q and R followed again, and it is not permissible for the plaintiff to change the facts concerning its substance, such as the scope of its members, differently from the initial argument that it would result in the change of the parties. Thus, the court should decide whether the plaintiff was the member of the clan, as originally asserted by the plaintiff, and it is inappropriate for the court to dismiss the lawsuit for the change of the clan to the extent that it is not permitted to change the clan 20 years old and R, and it shall not be decided differently from the plaintiff's previous argument that it would be permitted to change the clan 200 to the extent of the clan's members, and it shall not be decided differently from the plaintiff's joint clan 2984.294.

B. The plaintiff is each of the land of this case 1.