When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On December 12, 2014, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) around 22:15, at the main point of the operation of the Victim D (the 56 years old, the 56 years old, and the 203 years old), the Defendant interfered with the victim’s main business by force, such as the victim’s failure to perform a funeral service, on the ground that the victim demanded and settled the card and 84,000 won, which is more than his memory, and is larger than his memory.

2. The Defendant publicly insulting the victim by referring the victim F, who was the victim, to “whether or not the worker has been left her friend, her friend,” among 5-6 persons, including the main place of business D and the customer G, when he was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 at the same time and place as the preceding paragraph, and when he was sent, F, who was arrested the Defendant on the charge of interference with business.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police statement made to F and D;

1. As to the investigation report (in relation to insult, etc.)

1. To name witnesses and apply the Acts and subordinate statutes of receipts;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with Business, Selection of Fine) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;