2. The crime of this case is not likely to be committed by the defendant due to the issue of singing rates, etc. that the defendant committed the crime of this case against the victim and the victim of the victim of the victim of the victim of the victim of the victim of the victim of the victim of the victim of the case, and there are several records of punishment for the same crime, and in particular, the crime of this case committed during the period of repeated crime after the execution

However, in full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) the degree of injury is relatively minor; and (c) the extent of injury is favorable to the agreement with the victim; and (d) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship; (b) circumstances leading to the instant crime; (c) developments leading to the commission of the crime; (d) the means and consequence; and (e) the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the circumstances

There are no circumstances such as evaluation or maintenance of it is deemed unfair.

Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit, since the court below's punishment is too unfasible.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.