However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 19, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, etc. by the Jeju District Court on the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on December 27, 2019.

On June 28, 2019, the Defendant was prosecuted for the foregoing case with the Jeju District Court and was present as the Defendant in the above court No. 201 (Collegiate Panel Division 2B) around 11:40 on August 29, 2019.

The Defendant, in response to the previous criminal conciliation procedures, did not pay the above agreement amount to the victim by May 31, 2019, which was the designated date, under the condition that he would pay two million won as the criminal agreement amount, and thus was prosecuted for non-detained. However, when the victim would pay the agreement amount to the victim later, the Defendant was mistaken for the completion of the case at any time when the above court was notified of the attendance of the above court, and was able to mislead the victim to arbitrarily proceed with the trial without waiting the above agreement procedure and interfere with the progress of the above trial.

Accordingly, the Defendant, upon receiving the notice of the right to refuse to make a statement from the above presiding judge, was asked about whether he/she wants a participatory trial, and the above presiding judge himself/herself should confirm that he/she has come to know of the conclusion, not the Defendant, yet the Defendant. He/she expressed his/her desire to “I see that he/she has yet to come to know of the conclusion. He/she has been able to see how he/she has been able to see the processed matter, she has been able to me to see and open the processed matter.” Notwithstanding the presiding judge’s restraint, the Defendant had

As a result, the defendant made a insult in the court for the purpose of interfering with the court's trial.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the commencement of an investigation, a report on an investigation (attached to an indictment for a related case), a report on an investigation (a protocol of a trial, a file for recording a trial in a related case, and a record and a report on the preparation

1. A previous conviction in judgment: