However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 21:00 on November 29, 2014, the Defendant got out of the room while suffering disputes with the victim E (the age of 51) and the hulule at Jeju. On November 21, 2014, the Defendant got out of the room. In other words, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as the removal of the inner wall and the duule, which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment on one occasion by taking the face of the victim into consideration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning E, F, G, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to medical certificates and photographs of victims;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] General In the event that the basic area (4 to 1 year and 6 months) (including special mitigation) of the basic area (4 to 1 year and 6 months), the punishment is not applied (including serious efforts for recovery of damage), or considerable part of damage has been recovered, / the serious injury (1 to 4 types) [decision on a sentence] degree of damage is very serious, and the quality of the crime is not good because it does not reach an agreement with the victim, even though it is very serious.

However, it shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the fact that the victim deposited 8 million won for the victim, the defendant has no ability to punish more than the fine, the fact that there is no power to punish the defendant, and other various sentencing conditions such as the age of the defendant.