2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant stated that the director of the “D” manufacturer company in Ulsan-gun C, and the above “D” office around December 14, 201, the Defendant loaned money to the victim B, who is an employee of Ulsan-gun, to whom he belongs, “I will pay it in full if I lend money to the victim B, who is an employee of the Defendant.”

However, there was no particular property at the time, approximately KRW 50 million of debt was applied for individual rehabilitation in Busan District Court, and there was no intention or ability to repay the debt even if the borrower borrowed money from others in the condition that the benefit was seized.

As such, the Defendant was granted KRW 600,000 to a victim by deceiving the victim as such, KRW 600,000 from the victim’s seat around December 17, 201, KRW 300,000 on January 27, 2012, KRW 300,000 on February 17, 2012, KRW 80,000 on March 19, 2012, KRW 60,000 on March 29, 2012, KRW 50,000 on May 10, 2012, KRW 80,000 on May 18, 2012, KRW 250,000 on May 26, 2012, KRW 300,000 on June 8, 2012, and KRW 16,016,00 on loan under the pretext of a loan.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Act on the Statement of Evidence B

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that there is no previous conviction against the defendant, the defendant supports

1. Article 32 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits, etc. to Which an application for compensation order is filed (which is not reasonable to issue an order of compensation as the scope of