For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court did not constitute a crime against the facts charged in this case.

On the other hand, the judgment of the first instance that acquitted was affirmed.

In light of the record, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the grounds for rejecting liability for breach of the duty to pay wages and retirement allowances stipulated in the Labor Standard Act and the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits Act, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.