When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Part of the facts charged shall be revised and supplemented without going through amendments to indictment to the extent that it seems that there is no concern about substantial disadvantage to the defendant's defense right.

The defendant is a person who has a marital relationship with B on August 31, 2015, whose divorce has been concluded on August 31, 2015.

On February 17, 2015, the Defendant, at around 17:05, who was in the course of a divorce lawsuit with B, opened a cash withdrawal card in the name of the foreign exchange bank in the name of B from the home of B, and withdrawn KRW 3,910,000 in total four times in total, in the cash withdrawal period managed by one bank in the first floor of the Doo Building located in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on details of deposits transactions;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;