However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 01:40 on April 15, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business affairs by force, such as: (a) on the “D’s operation” of the Victim C located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si B and the second floor; (b) his/her female-friendly group did not receive monthly pay; and (c) he/she was unable to receive monthly pay; (d) he/she shouldered the alcohol residues on his/her tables; and (d) he/she was off his/her shouldered, cut off, and off his/her jackets, thereby obstructing the Defendant’s business affairs concerning the operation of the victim’s main

2. In the same time and place as referred to in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant destroyed the victim C’s market price on the table, which was on the table for the foregoing reasons, by breaking three U.S. glass cups on the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Entry of C’s statement;

1. Application of the video-related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In the case of crimes No. 1 (Interference with Duties) of the scope of the recommended punishment [the scope of the recommended punishment] of crimes (including serious efforts to recover damage) of Type 1 (Interference with Duties) of the mitigated punishment area (one month to eight months) [the scope of the recommended punishment] of the mitigated punishment area (including serious efforts to recover damage), the scope of the recommended punishment] of the mitigated area (one month to six months), of the mitigated area (one month to six months), or of the mitigated punishment area (including serious efforts to recover damage), the final sentencing scope of the aggravated punishment due to the aggravated punishment: January to November:

2. Circumstances favorable to the determination of sentence: The defendant is deemed to have led to the crime of this case, and his mistake appears to be repented, and the injured party does not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent with the victim: The defendant has already been punished for the crime of violence tendency several times, but he is not well aware of it.