However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around December 23:25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) on the 9th apartment of the Gunsan-si, Simsan-si; (b) on the 1112 report of drinking alcohol, the Defendant demanded voluntary operation from the head E of the police station D District Police Station affiliated with the Gun Police Station D, which called “Yeec flap fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe f.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment prescribed for the crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties against E with heavier punishment);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The crime of this case with the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution is not that the crime of this case was committed by a police officer, who is performing legitimate official duties, with the desire to put him in the vehicle or horse entrance, and assault him.

However, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime, against himself while committing the instant crime, and is making efforts to recover damage by depositing some of the money, etc., and the Defendant was past.