2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16093, Jan. 1,

On November 2, 2014, the Defendant, within the “D convenience store” operated by Gwangju Northern-gu B and the Victim C (52 tax, south) around November 2, 2014, discharged KRW 1,390,000 in cash owned by the Defendant, which was kept in custody of the Defendant’s depository, using the gap in the management of the victim’s negligence.

The summary of the evidence brought about theft;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (related to change of the name of a crime);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;