beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2020.02.20 2018고단790

사기

Text

[Defendant A] As to the crime of 2019 Godan198 decided on Defendant A, Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and the crime of 2018 Godan790 decided on this issue.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] Defendant A was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Daegu District Court on December 2, 2011, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 10, 201. On February 15, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to two months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court on February 31, 2015 and completed the execution of each of the above imprisonment.

[2018 Highest 790] Defendant A was a person who runs a construction business and was constructing a sub-building C (hereinafter referred to as the "instant building"), and Defendant B is non-permanent.

Defendant

A was sentenced to two months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court around February 15, 2013, and Defendant B was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Daegu District Court around June 27, 2012, and became aware of one year and two months in prison due to a violation of the Automobile Management Act, and continued to use the instant building, etc. as collateral, while continuing to exist after the release, with money from a third party, and had a life, such as lending money from another person to another person.

While the Defendants colored a person who will borrow money, they came to know of the victim E (the age of 34) by Defendant B, the husband of female and female, the Defendants conspired to use the instant building as collateral and use the building in installments for the repayment of the existing obligations of the Defendants.

Defendant

B) On February 3, 2017, the Plaintiff called “A” to the victim at a Buddhist place and received KRW 20 million from the G Association account (H) of F, the spouse of Defendant B, on the same day. “The last construction cost is insufficient. If the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 20 million, the Plaintiff may complete the construction and receive the loan within two months after completing the construction.”

On February 7, 2017, the Defendants met the victim at a coffee shop where the name on the Yancheon-si, Changcheon-si could not be known, and Defendant A met the victim, while Defendant A took the priority mortgage on loan to the victim.

참조조문