However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

In the name of the phishing mediation staff, when they misrepresented a large number of unspecified victims to pay the existing loans by misrepresenting them to B bank staff, etc., they acquired money by misrepresenting that the existing loans will be remitted at a low interest rate to a bank designated account.

The Defendant accepted a proposal from the said Defendant’s “to give three million won per month in consideration of the withdrawal of the amount remitted to the Defendant’s account and deliver it to the employee sending the amount to the Defendant’s account,” which was accepted by the said Defendant.

On January 15, 2018, at around 18:00, 201, the 3 million won was transferred from the damaged person to the D bank account (E) account in the name of the Defendant by making a false statement that “if the existing loan is repaid, it is possible to lend up to 58 million won at low interest rate if the existing loan is repaid, it is possible to transfer the existing loan to the designated account.”

At around 18:30 on the same day, the Defendant released the total amount of KRW 15 million transferred to a bank account in the name of the above Defendant at around the upper franc shop located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, and delivered it to the Defendant franc singing staff.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, withdrawn the money from the Defendant’s name in order to assist the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the court room and statement of the defendant in the first trial proceedings;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Results of reply to execution of the warrant, details of passbook transactions, and details of passbook transactions;

1. Application of the F dialogue-related legislation.