The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court’s determination that the Defendant was guilty of both violation of the Creation and Management of Forest Resources Act and breach of trust (excluding the part not guilty of the grounds) among the facts charged in the instant case.

In the lower judgment, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the wrongful solicitation of the theft of forest products and the intent of unlawful acquisition or misappropriation, and property interests

Therefore, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.