beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.05.12 2015고정806

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 29, 2015, the Defendant driven the vehicle of the Cpoter II around 07:20 on January 29, 2015, and proceeded at approximately 70km in speed from the parallel parallel to the other parallel at the parallel of the parallel of the Cpoter II in Seosung-gu Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon.

Since the location is a four-distance intersection where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to live well on the right and the right and the right, and to drive safely in accordance with the signals.

However, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to enter the intersection by failing to cause a change of vehicle driving signals to a stop signal, and instead by failing to make a signal, found the victim D ( South, 65 years old, left left pursuant to the new subparagraph)’s Epoter II vehicle of the victim D (the victim South, 65 years old) who was making a left-hand turn at the right-hand level, and operated the hand to avoid this. However, the part on the front left-hand hand of the damaged vehicle was received as the front-hand part of the vehicle steering ahead of the front-hand part of the damaged vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, from the above occupational negligence, the injury to the victim D, such as salt, tensions, etc., of clocks, tensions, etc., and the injury to the victim F (F, 55 years old) of the victim of the damaged vehicle, such as clocks and tensions that require approximately 4 weeks of treatment, cage cages, cages, and chages and tensions, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and G;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. The main sentence of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which bears the costs of lawsuit;